[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: decnet versions
>If you've a chance to get the crash dump from Linux, can you find out
>which function it was in when it crashed ? The whole stack back trace
>would be more useful still.. ?
I can probably get it to do it again. What info do you need, and how do
you get it. Just write down the info on the screen?
If you need some tests run on this I should be able to manage it.
>Also I should take the oppertunity to point out that that code in the
>2.3.xx kernel series, is much more recent (the 2.3.39 patch being the
>latest) than that in the 2.2.xx series. I has the choice of back porting
>the bug fixes and code I had written to 2.2.xx, or producing something
>much better in time for 2.4.xx. I chose the latter (due to time constraints),
>so if 2.2.xx doesn't work, try 2.3.xx with all the usual warnings about
>expecting crashes etc. with development kernels :-)
I've been tempted, but I've been staying away from the bleeding edge as
I've learned to value stability :^)
Zane
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
| healyzh@aracnet.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
| healyzh@holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, send a mail to majordomo@dreamtime.org
containing the line "unsubscribe linux-decnet"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------